Autopilot capabilities |
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Author | |
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 652 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Here's one common example of what GPSS roll steering offers:
Many small aircraft have a single-axis autopilot that works with a combination of desired heading (where the bug on the heading indicator is set) and GPS CDI needle deflection. If HI shows right of course, and the CDI needle shows right of course, the autopilot will input a left roll to try to correct. This setup allows the aircraft to follow a straight course line, but at the next GPS waypoint with a heading change, the pilot needs to adjust the bug on the HI appropriately for the system to track that next, different, straight course line. This setup will not allow the aircraft to follow a curved path in the flight plan, at least not without the pilot continually adjusting the HI bug, which is not really practical. With GPSS, the dependency on the heading indicator bug is removed. Now, with no action required from the pilot, the autopilot can smoothly fly all the turns in the GPS's flight plan, including course reversals, holding patterns, DME arcs, etc. Pilot just sits back and watches. It's a very nice feature. Just expensive.
Edited by MysticCobra - 31 Oct 2013 at 8:09pm |
|
phkmn
Groupie Joined: 06 Feb 2013 Location: Chicago Status: Offline Points: 78 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
GPSS processing takes advantage of the GPS' knowledge of your current and future course, ground speed and ground track. Combined with WAAS, precise information is available about current location so that a track can be followed exactly. Turns are anticipated, so there's no overshoot when course changes with waypoint passage. GPSS will fly accurate holds with crosswinds and with a capable autopilot will make smooth and seamless transitions from enroute to approach modes right to the runway threshold. You will have to manage your own altitude unless the a/p has a glideslope capability.
As a 530 replacement, I don't consider it reasonable to expect GPSS built into the 540. Edited by phkmn - 31 Oct 2013 at 5:39pm |
|
PH
|
|
Paul
Senior Member Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 285 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The IFD 540 is (supposedly) amazing. The amount of money I'm spending on all of this is really amazing. For the benefit of those of us who have never flown in a GA aircraft with GPSS, could you please provide a bit more information? |
|
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
GPSS is amazing.
|
|
David Gates
|
|
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1022 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Paul,
I expect the IFD 540 to behave like a GNS 430W in this respect, and the key to determining your GPSS options will be the capabilities and input requirements of the AP…. but one never knows what surprise Avidyne might have up their sleeves. I have a 430W and Sandel HSI feeding an STEC GPSS which in turn feeds an STEC 30 AP. The GPSS is a stand-alone unit with just a square push-button on the panel that toggles between 2 modes: HDG & GPSS and determines the nav source: AC/DC heading error or GPS roll steering data. The STEC 30 has 4 roll modes: Stabilizer (which is controlled by turn left/right knob), Heading, and Lo/Hi Track. The AP is normally set in HD mode as long as the 430W is producing GPS roll steering data (i.e. following a flight plan or approach procedure), and the GPSS should be in GPSS mode. The GPS roll steering output is wonderful and will make lovely smooth DME arcs, intercepts, turn anticipation, etc, following a GPS overlay of a VOR/LOC proc. If the GPSS is in HDG mode, then the HSI/DG heading bug output is used if the AP is in heading mode or 430W VOR/LOC AC/DC heading error if the AP is in Lo/Hi Track mode (Lo for VOR, Hi for LOC/ILS). I'm not sure, but I suppose that in this case the GPSS is in a sort of pass-through mode of the heading error signal to the AP. I'm certain that once you have seen GPSS performance, you won't want to be without it due to the accuracy and functionality of the GPS roll steering data. If I recall correctly, the STEC GPSS was about $1000 and really gets the most out of a GPS. I'm not familiar with the capabilities of the Icarus or DAC units. I don't know if the STEC GPSS unit will only mate with a rate-based AP like STEC produces, but perhaps the AC/DC heading error signal is standardised and accepted by both rate and attitude based AP's. Vince |
|
Vince
|
|
Paul
Senior Member Joined: 17 Aug 2012 Location: Massachusetts Status: Offline Points: 285 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The autopilot in my aircraft, a KAP 140, does not provide GPSS roll steering. It sounds like the IFD 540 will not give me this capability (although I would like that confirmed by Avidyne). I can see four choices, in order from most to least expensive:
Is roll steering is worthwhile in a Cessna 172 with a single axis autopilot? Which of these could be installed with the IFD 540 in a certificated 172? The Icarus has a display and some capabilities that the DAC does not. It also requires panel space which would be difficult to come by. Does the IFD 540 have features which make the Icarus' extra capabilities redundant? If I'm going to add this capability I would prefer to do it when the IFD 540 is installed. That saves on installation costs. And the pilot won't have to deal with the panel changing twice. |
|
Post Reply | Page <12 |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |