Another run at the DFC90? |
Post Reply |
Author | |
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Posted: 27 Jul 2017 at 10:08am |
Does all the activity at OSH around autopilots suggest a pathway and interest for Avidyne to dust off the DFC90 and bring it to market with servos and a clean sheet install? Cost barriers should at least be better under the new and improved STC pathway.
Pen in hand, ready to write another check... Edited by ddgates - 27 Jul 2017 at 10:10am |
|
David Gates
|
|
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
No reply to your ping here, David. I guess that means the DFC is essentially a dormant (dead?) product. I notice that while both DFC90 and DFC100 pilot guides are still on the web site, some of the links in those manuals are dead ends. The DFC90 is still in the price list, but the DFC100 has disappeared so I guess it is no longer being sold.
BTW, it looks from the available documentation that a prerequisite is either an Aspen or Avidyne Entegra EXP5000, as an attitude source. With the new solid state AI's now on the market, these would seem to be just as valid for input but there is so little info on the DFC on the Avidyne web site that there doesn't seem to be any interest in Avidyne to further develop the AP product. A bit of a shame.
|
|
Vince
|
|
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Wonder if the TruTrack and Trio autopilots coming to the certificated market took some of the wind out of Avidyne's AP sails (sales).
|
|
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Could be, although they are GPS-only APs and don't track legacy analog signals (esp. ILS).
|
|
Vince
|
|
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I agree the target markets do not completely overlap. But where they do, the T* APs offer a significant price advantage, making it harder to Avidyne to compete. They may have decided that the remaining market segment where customers wanted the DFC features was not large enough to continue their investment. All pure speculation, of course.
|
|
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Last I recall (recalling I prepurchased a DFC90 in 2011, and was told a servo solution was no more than 6 months away) the issue still is servo deficit, but also cost of STC airframe by airframe.
Truly a shame, as the DFC90 or DFC100 are really good autopilots - a few 90s got sold to install over STEC servos. My sideline observation is that the DFC90 project is DOA. |
|
David Gates
|
|
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3061 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
The TruTrak + ASPEN E5/Pro install is setting the low water mark for price, together with a high water mark for function, and that is without talking about the SkyView.
It will be tough sledding for any of the classic A/P manufacturers and their products, at least in the lower end of the market. There is little chance that you will see the STEC 3100 with as wide of an AML as their legacy 55x. I would slip in a DFC90 in a heartbeat, for my 55x, but I seriously doubt its future availability for my plane. * Orest Edited by oskrypuch - 03 Jun 2018 at 2:11pm |
|
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1035 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Orest,
According to the DFC90 page on Avidyne.com:
"DFC90 is plug & play with the STEC55X, and STEC30/50/60-2/65 series autopilots may also be replaced by a DFC90 under these STCs." Doesn't that mean that you could install in your aircraft? Or do I read that wrong? The other prereq is an Aspen, which you have. I have an STEC30, so an installation reusing those servos would keep the installation cost to a minimum. However, I don't have an Aspen so that's a deal-breaker. But as David mentions, it appears that the DFC90 doesn't have any future.
Edited by chflyer - 03 Jun 2018 at 4:52pm |
|
Vince
|
|
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
To use a DFC90 over a previous STEC, you also have to have a pitch trim servo (which means you have to have the STEC, electric trim, and an Aspen).
Now that others are coming to market with the same scenario, Orest could do the STEC 3100 (also digital) to better advantage, and less costly. The 3100 would install right over his other STEC if I understand it correctly.
Edited by ddgates - 03 Jun 2018 at 6:45pm |
|
David Gates
|
|
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3061 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I have the STEC automatic electric trim. Problem is that Avidyne has only STC'd the Cirrus, Bo & C182 for the 55x/DFC90 silde out/in swap out.
And, unfortunately the STEC 3100 is NOT a slide out/in replacement for a 55x. It is not pin compatible and even the entire harness has to be replaced, so not really worth it. And, IAC STEC has not STC'd my plane either, yet. * Orest Edited by oskrypuch - 03 Jun 2018 at 8:03pm |
|
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Orest:
My bad. I have Bonanza on the brain. It does look like Genesys is moving rapidly to STC their 3100 though.
|
|
David Gates
|
|
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3061 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Not a bad thing to have on your brain. I was flying a Bo for a while, nice bird. If/when the 3100 STC is available, may look at it, but as I say it would be a lot of rewiring even though ostensibly you are just replacing the head. * Orest Edited by oskrypuch - 04 Jun 2018 at 3:21pm |
|
TurboPA30
Senior Member Joined: 18 Sep 2010 Location: 27XS Status: Offline Points: 138 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
Want to talk a little about the Cessna / ARC autopilots, especially the 400B. It works very well when it is working, however, maintenance capability is rapidly disappearing with the age of the specialists. There is really nothing wrong with the servos, and overhauling servos will be possible for much longer, and changing out teh servos is the real high cost of a complete autopilot change.
Thus, a challenge for the Avidyne engineers: Everybody seems to target any autopilot improvements on Century and S-tec, and Bendix King. What about offering an upgrade path using the DFC-90 for the 400B installation, reusing the servos? That should give you a few hundred installs at least! And does not require your own servos.
|
|
MarkZ
Senior Member Joined: 05 Sep 2015 Location: 0TX0 Status: Offline Points: 172 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
I’m in on the 400B project!
|
|
AviSteve
Admin Group Joined: 12 Feb 2018 Location: Melbourne, FL Status: Offline Points: 2247 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
I wish we had the manpower to keep pace with all the good ideas that get floated around. Not to say that we'll never work on DFC90 again, but it's just a matter of priorities.
|
|
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering |
|
Post Reply | |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |