Suggestions for 10.3 |
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 9> |
Author | ||
2thomas
Newbie Joined: 29 Jun 2019 Location: ft myers Status: Offline Points: 11 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
1. would like to see kind of custom sort ability of the flight plans and/or also favorites beside the stored ones. 2. when activating VTF, i should have an extended magenta center line to the runway. often, the vector leads you between the FAF and runway and mostly you do it on VFR App also. default looks like the leg to FAF turns magenta. thanks thomas
|
||
“Respect others and their views. And demand they respect yours”
|
||
DH82FLYER
Groupie Joined: 15 Dec 2012 Location: Queensland Status: Offline Points: 88 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A suggestion: A single aural callout of “Altitude” as you approach an ‘altitude constraint’ in the FMS. It could occur as the ‘Boeing Banana’ disappears, ie approx 150 ft from the target altitude. Thomas
Edited by DH82FLYER - 05 Jul 2019 at 9:35am |
||
jhbehrens
Senior Member Joined: 15 Dec 2012 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I would like the IFD540 to pass TAS traffic, not just ADS-B traffic, to Foreflight over wifi.
|
||
teeth6
Senior Member Joined: 10 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 741 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I’d like to see the aircraft stay centered on airport taxiway charts as it proceeds along. This was a nice feature on the EX500 airport charts but on the IFDs, it’s necessary to keep moving the chart on the touch screen to follow the aircrafts progress and keep it in view.
|
||
KIM
Groupie Joined: 12 Oct 2013 Status: Offline Points: 62 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1
|
||
Klaus
|
||
PA20Pacer
Senior Member Joined: 07 Mar 2012 Location: Illinois (LL22) Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I agree with Jim that it would be a nice feature. Regards, Bob
|
||
Bob Siegfried, II
Brookeridge Airpark (LL22) Downers Grove, IL |
||
AviSteve
Admin Group Joined: 12 Feb 2018 Location: Melbourne, FL Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It's in our list of enhancements, but hasn't been scheduled yet.
|
||
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering |
||
SB Jim
Senior Member Joined: 30 Aug 2012 Status: Offline Points: 204 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Regarding audible call-outs while on instrument approaches - I think these would be EXTREMELY VALUABLE. Especially on approaches with multiple step down fixes.
If it’s easier to program, a simple tone (a ding, a bell, whatever) would be fine as well to let me know I’m crossing the fix. Having said that I just got my IFD 540 upgraded (it has been unchanged since it was installed in 2015). I’m going to try using the IFD 100 on my ipad during an instrument approach to see if that makes fix identification easier. It may. My preference on instrument approaches is the have the approach plate on my iPad in front of me although I don’t trust the iPad fix locations (it’s not a certified WAAS navigator for instrument flight). I’d rather watch the plate on the iPad but have the box “ding” or tell me when I’m crossing each step down fix. Any chance we can get something like this? Or do I have it already and just don’t realize that yet? Jim
|
||
ddgates
Senior Member Joined: 12 Aug 2011 Location: Deer Valley Status: Offline Points: 1100 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1 May not be possible with Avi architecture but presumably there will be more cycles of updates, and the current pathway leaves much to be desired.
|
||
David Gates
|
||
Catani
Senior Member Joined: 21 Jan 2016 Status: Offline Points: 362 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
If feasible, design the units so they won't brick themselves during updates and upgrades because of power interruptions:
Buffer the upload of databases so that the box does not enter "update mode" status (and potentially brick itself if power is interrupted), and remains status quo until the entire file is uploaded to the unit. Make navdata updates robust by having the unit abort and return to its known prior good state after a power interruption, so as not to brick the unit. Do not allow the unit to "forget" its prior valid state until a new update has been installed and verified. Do the same for software upgrades, if possible. |
||
DavidBunin
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2015 Location: Rockwall, TX Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not true. It wakes up every time power is applied, regardless of the shut down method. As discussed here, I was motivated to install an avionics master switch after the IFD installation for this very reason.
|
||
oskrypuch
Senior Member Joined: 09 Nov 2012 Location: CYFD Status: Offline Points: 3058 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
+1 on the avionics switch, saves wear & tear & time. Some of my electronics do not have an ON/OFF switch, and would come on for engine start, not a good idea. My avionics switch (when OFF) energizes a relay, which opens a circuit, and will cut the power feed to the avionics bus. If the switch fails, then in fail-safe fashion the avionics bus goes live. I also have a guarded, backup avionics breaker/switch under the panel that will supply power to the avionics bus from a separate circuit, just in case. Both were factory, and that is a fairly standard setup. That all would be a pain to install. If you don't have an avionics switch, then just installing two switch/breakers in parallel to feed the avionics bus should work well, and be relatively fail-safe. * Orest
Edited by oskrypuch - 18 May 2019 at 12:14pm |
||
George P
Groupie Joined: 29 Jan 2017 Location: Big Horn, WY Status: Offline Points: 45 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
My Mooney had a "fail on" avionics solinoid master which pretty much solved that problem.
|
||
allenc3
Senior Member Joined: 04 Feb 2019 Location: 32043 Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not really. Not good for the indivual radio, and sets up a very nasty single point of failure. if The master switch fails (and switch's do often fail) You could be truly in a world of hurt as you just lost all your avionics in one swoop. This is why you dont see avionics masters in combat aircraft.
|
||
Claude
|
||
allenc3
Senior Member Joined: 04 Feb 2019 Location: 32043 Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Not exactly true. Using an Avionics master continually will make the individual switch's and knobs on your various avionics become sticky unless exercised now and then.
|
||
Claude
|
||
RGLADY
Newbie Joined: 22 Apr 2019 Location: TN Status: Offline Points: 5 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
AviSteve,I see that the IFD will network with a portable stratus. Will it also network with a Garmin GDL50? It would be great if the ADSB data from the portables would be able to display weather and traffic on the IDF100 app. Is this possible?
|
||
FlyingCOham
Senior Member Joined: 30 Oct 2015 Location: COS (KFLY) Status: Offline Points: 125 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
An avionics master switch is a good thing for all your electronics. |
||
Jim Patton
|
||
teeth6
Senior Member Joined: 10 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 741 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I could be wrong but I thought if you power down the 440 by pushing the button it will not power up with the avionics master but by pushing the button on the IFD again when ready.
Edited by teeth6 - 16 May 2019 at 1:12pm |
||
allenc3
Senior Member Joined: 04 Feb 2019 Location: 32043 Status: Offline Points: 126 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Is it possible to make it optional for the IDF440 to NOT power up when the master is turned on. Make it optional. I would like to beable to power up my avionicas after engine start.
|
||
Claude
|
||
AviSteve
Admin Group Joined: 12 Feb 2018 Location: Melbourne, FL Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Those two data quantities are shown simultaneously on the FPL page already, per leg. If you're trying to stay on the Map page, then I would suggest configuring one of the datablocks to show distance to the active waypoint. Then you could see distance to the waypoint in the datablock and the crossing altitude would be displayed on the map (but both visible at the same time; subject to map decluttering). |
||
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering |
||
Stevei
Groupie Joined: 13 Dec 2018 Location: No. California Status: Offline Points: 64 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Don't know if this has been suggested already. Apologies if done so.
On flying a procedure, it's terrific to have the altitude necessary to cross the fix. Add a field that would show the distance to the next fix. I think that would be very helpful for situational awareness and enable us to stay on the same screen.
|
||
ColinW
Newbie Joined: 24 May 2016 Location: EGGP Liverpool Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Progress in Europe on implementing RF legs
... well, for certain G* installations so far. Work is ongoing to expand the field
|
||
DavidBunin
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2015 Location: Rockwall, TX Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Lots of misuse of the word "heading" here. To be clear, it is the CDI "course" that is being set. The 'other' thing with the knob.
|
||
mklepper
Newbie Joined: 18 Mar 2019 Location: Ft Myers, FL Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
OK thanks, Yes, once I set the heading on the CDI, the message went away. I rarely bother adjusting the CDI heading on my experimental, as I set the heading on my EFIS. The heading on the Pilatus EFIS apparently is connected back to the 440. Learn something new everyday. |
||
AZ Flyer
Senior Member Joined: 12 Feb 2018 Location: Tucson, AZ Status: Offline Points: 164 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That is what was happening in my Aspen/IFD540 panel. I didn't realize that the IFD was prompting me to set the heading on the Aspen until now. Thanks for that insight! I flew yesterday and that is exactly what it was prompting me to do. Another IFD mystery solved.
Edited by AZ Flyer - 24 Mar 2019 at 6:30am |
||
MysticCobra
Senior Member Joined: 29 Jan 2013 Status: Offline Points: 648 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In my plane, as long as I'm "close" (maybe +/- 3deg) on the CDI, the IFD is satisfied and will clear the alert. Regardless of where the CDI is set, my GPSS-driven autopilot is dead on the magenta line when the IFD is in GPS mode.
Edited by MysticCobra - 23 Mar 2019 at 9:02pm |
||
DavidBunin
Senior Member Joined: 20 May 2015 Location: Rockwall, TX Status: Offline Points: 742 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
It may be telling you to set the OBS course to that value. Mine does that for my CDI if I don't twist it.
|
||
mklepper
Newbie Joined: 18 Mar 2019 Location: Ft Myers, FL Status: Offline Points: 4 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Suggestion for 10.3 I fly a small experimental. While on autopilot, tracking the GPS, I often get a popup message saying to adjust heading to xxx. (Turn to xxx) My autopilot is flying that xxx heading + or - a degree. (I know the bigger stuff like the Pilatus I fly, is dead on and this isn't an issue.) What would be nice would be a setting to loosen up the trigger for that popup alert by an extra degree or two. Thanks |
||
AviSteve
Admin Group Joined: 12 Feb 2018 Location: Melbourne, FL Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's correct.
|
||
Steve Lindsley
Avidyne Engineering |
||
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1022 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I know it's well over a year away, but it would be nice to have confirmation from Avidyne that support for RF legs won't have any more implementation restrictions than those for the Garmin GTN. Specifically, per the AFMS the GTN is approved to fly uncoupled RF legs ... i.e. does not require an A/P or FD.
|
||
Vince
|
||
Bob H
Senior Member Joined: 26 Jan 2018 Location: NH - KMHT Status: Offline Points: 290 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
In regard to remembering the last leg upon startup, I
prefer to start with a clean slate. Things can change between
shutdown and startup on how I’m going to fly. A clean slate has me
be very deliberate about my route right before takeoff. The primary
function of the IFD is to support IFR flight plans, this is a VFR point to
point request, which I think will actually hinder IFR
operations. Some things to consider: ·
Most of the time, I’m not sure what my next
route or waypoint will be upon shutdown, so this feature will rarely come into
play. Also, after shutdown or before the next flight, I can always
put waypoints into the IFD100 for auto loading when connected to the panel IFD. ·
When flying IFR, upon shutdown, the IFD will
retain the last route flown. Then on
startup, I no longer have the option of just entering a route on the FPL
page. I will either need to delete the old waypoints while entering
the new, or I will be relegated to entering everything new in the ROUTE page. It
limits my options and will cause extra work. ·
Upon startup now, I can do a database update in less
time than it takes to warm up, taxi, and run-up. Loading a single
VFR waypoint would be simpler and faster than that. I think you will
find no extended run-up is necessary. I am left to conclude that for most IFR operations, this
feature request would be a hindrance. Also, it will only come into
play when the next VFR flight and waypoint are known, which is probably not
very often (at least for me). Even then, the IFD 100 will certainly
suffice. |
||
Bob
|
||
Flybuddy
Senior Member Joined: 25 Jan 2019 Location: Fort Myers Status: Offline Points: 145 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Got an IFD being installed this week but got to fly a neighbors plane equipped with a 440 this morning and work an IFD for the first time. I was very impressed with it as I was able to do all functions by myself with no help and no manual. Really user friendly and intuitive. One suggestion, on simple direct to flights it would be nice if the IFD remembered last leg entered upon startup this way you could put your next destination prior to shutdown. May not seem like a big deal but helpful when you have multiple devices to set up making for an extended run up. Yes, I do know you can save as a prior flight plan but it's still easier if you don't have to touch it at all (except for allow/ignore).
|
||
ColinW
Newbie Joined: 24 May 2016 Location: EGGP Liverpool Status: Offline Points: 24 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
To underline the disappointment about no RF leg capability, in
Europe SESAR is funding a project to demonstrate that GA aircraft can successfully fly non-standard approach profiles including RF legs. The selection of participants was limited to those with GTN boxes at software v6.21 or above. The flying is due to start in April or May. What a shame Avidyne is not at the party
Edited by ColinW - 12 Mar 2019 at 6:34pm |
||
Alouicious
Newbie Joined: 16 Dec 2015 Location: OR70 and KBOW Status: Offline Points: 20 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Excellent thread started by Steve! Lots of great suggestions.
Bummer about Avidyne's interpretation of the regs on installation of firmware updates vs data updates. Seems the wording from FAR 43 (as quoted by AzFlyer and HenryM in the "Update-on-10-2-3-1-software" thread) would allow, though maybe the local FAA rep implied otherwise.
Maybe, to get this one to us, he (we?) needs to start another thread for the NEXT update... As one who chose Wing X over Foreflight a long time ago (and relieved that Boeing spared Wing X), sure glad for Garmin's foray into data: Competition reduced the Jepp subscription price for us. Still would prefer an alternative to Jepp. AVIdly anticipating this release! Thanks, Steve, et al! |
||
Be happy! Your choice.
|
||
dmtidler
Senior Member Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 616 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Our IFDs (and maybe the IFD100 soon) have the ability to offset UTC by a fixed amount on a per user basis. I was trying to gauge interest in an automatic option for this offset. Currently, if one would like that offset to reflect local time, they would have to manually change that offset value every time they cross a time zone or when going in or out of DST (for each affected user). Thanks for pointing out that UTC would be required data for this calculation.
|
||
Bob H
Senior Member Joined: 26 Jan 2018 Location: NH - KMHT Status: Offline Points: 290 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Bob
|
||
LANCE
Senior Member Joined: 06 Dec 2014 Location: TEXAS Status: Offline Points: 277 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
That's why we have UTC (Universal Coordinated Time)
|
||
dmtidler
Senior Member Joined: 12 Feb 2016 Location: USA Status: Offline Points: 616 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Just a thought especially today....how about an automatic local time offset option? Additionally, local time ETAs would show correct local time ETAs even if ETA fix time offset is different than current position time offset.
|
||
donemory
Groupie Joined: 18 Feb 2019 Location: Medina, OH Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Yes, I meant Boeing purchasing ForeFlight...sorry.
|
||
Don
|
||
jhbehrens
Senior Member Joined: 15 Dec 2012 Location: Netherlands Status: Offline Points: 122 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I'd like to add my vote for supporting RF legs in both the FAA STC and the EASA validation of that STC
|
||
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1022 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Adding US govt charts has been on the feature request list since the IFDs were still in gestation.
While I understand the cost element, I would vote against Avidyne making this a high priority for the following reasons: 1 - It only benefits US users. There are other items that would benefit all users. 2 - Having charts (Jepp or govt) on ForeFlight or any other tablet app reduces the need for charts on the in-panel unit. I have Jepp charts, and am still not ready to pay the extra to get them on the IFD. Besides, they are closer and easier to view on a tablet. 3 - The expensive Avidyne in-panel screen space can be better used than to display charts. |
||
Vince
|
||
paulr
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2014 Status: Offline Points: 545 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
The easy pickins' would be for the new "Boflight" to tack on another $50 to all their IFR products and bundle Jepp charts, like it or not. Easy incremental revenue with no downside to them.
There are lots of other ways they could creatively jack up prices; I am honestly more concerned that their trend of stuffing turbine/121/military-oriented features into the product will continue and the piston/small turboprop GA side will languish.
|
||
Bob H
Senior Member Joined: 26 Jan 2018 Location: NH - KMHT Status: Offline Points: 290 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
|
||
Bob
|
||
donemory
Groupie Joined: 18 Feb 2019 Location: Medina, OH Status: Offline Points: 44 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
I am new to the IDF family as I’ll be installing a new IDF540 hopefully later this month to replace my GNS 530W. As I try to get updated on this fantastic box, I see their is a void in approach charts available on the IFD. I currently use government charts on my Aspen 3 display & Foreflight software and they are considerably less expensive than the Jeppensen charts. Now after the Boeing acquisition of Jeppensen recently announced, I am sure prices will only go up. It sure would be nice if Avidyne would offer both government charts & Jeppensen to give us a choice. I find my government charts work just fine for me.
|
||
Don
|
||
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1022 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Avidyne IFDs are great boxes (I have a 540/440 pair) and I just love flying with them.
But one sure notices that the company doesn't have the resources or market penetration of G*. For keeping currency, x-plane not only has integrated support for the GNS530/430 but also the GTN 750/650 via RealityXP. This now includes support for RF legs too! So European Garmin customers can practice the RF legs on x-plane and then go fly them using their G* units!!! This is of course just a dream for us IFD users, as RF leg support in the in-panel boxes likely won't come before 2020 at the earliest and there is no sign that Laminar Research or RealityXP has any interest to support the Avidyne units...... a shame. |
||
Vince
|
||
chflyer
Senior Member Joined: 24 Jan 2013 Location: LSZK Status: Offline Points: 1022 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
GTN navigators now have EASA approval for flying RF legs in Europe, with same prerequisites as specified by the FAA. This will be a big detractor for the IFDs as the number of IAPs with RF legs is increasing. A shame that we won't see it in the IFD until 10.4 or later which likely means well into 2020.
|
||
Vince
|
||
Giuan123
Newbie Joined: 16 Feb 2019 Location: Italy Status: Offline Points: 3 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Is it possible to have the functionality of the GTN 650? Selectable VNAV on waypoints processable by the DFC90? This will be helpful for those airfield in Europe without GPS approach subscribed but that are in conditions to be used as described.
Also they have a nice feature: once you plan to land in an airfield contained in the database the GTN650 will calculate the approach circuit to the airfield (based on the pubblished altitude datas inside the database) and it calculates an approach procedure and a circuit at a proper altitude. What do you think? Avidyne is always a step formward, (always), but this feature is clever and helpful and seems to be an Avidyne solution, NOT a Garmin solution. Best regards Giovanni
Edited by Giuan123 - 03 Mar 2019 at 3:20am |
||
terryp
Newbie Joined: 30 Jan 2018 Location: UK Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
A big +1 for simplifying the present position hold / orbit functionality. It takes way too many steps / button presses currently.
|
||
ansond
Senior Member Joined: 12 Nov 2009 Location: Austin, Texas Status: Offline Points: 145 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
|
Got another 10.3 thought... perhaps there is already a quick way to do this... but how about an "orbit here" option that would setup a temporary waypoint automatically, then allow you to orbit LH or RH with a specific radius...
I can do this now with my IFD... but it takes a few steps to create the waypoint, then add the orbit, then edit the orbit to suit. Wondering if a shortcut to do that would be possible?... You could also have a shortcut for "hold here" in pretty much the same light. Just a thought! Thanks again Avidyne! Doug N208LG
Edited by ansond - 02 Mar 2019 at 3:23pm |
||
teeth6
Senior Member Joined: 10 Mar 2014 Status: Offline Points: 741 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
|
I’d like to see the newer weather products from ADS-B ( especially cloud tops) in 10.3.
|
||
Post Reply | Page <1 23456 9> |
Tweet
|
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |